-1-
Cirebon Coast shipwreck
Cirebon
is a medium sized city with a population of 0.3 Million on the island
of 'Java' in the Indonesian archipelago. The only fact of historical
significance or importance about this town is that it was an independent
state under the control of a Sultan. This Sultan gave up his
independence in 1705 to become a vassal or a feudatory king under the
Dutch colonists and Cirebon's independent existence came to an end.
After Indonesia became independent from the Dutch, this city became part
of Indonesia. Even though Cirebon has no historical significance, it is
a town of great geographical significance because of it's strategic
location. Right from historical times, enormous volume of shipping
traffic has been passing near it's coast. In ancient days, Cirebon was
an important mercantile harbour for trade between middle east, India,
Java, Sumatra and China.
About
a decade ago, some fishermen found out about an ancient shipwreck in
the Java Sea off the town of Cirebon. They reported the matter to
Indonesian authorities. However, lacking necessary salvaging equipments
and also due to paucity of funds, the Indonesian Government was not able
to take up any steps regarding any salvaging operation on the
shipwreck. A Belgian treasure hunter specializing in salvaging the
treasures on such old shipwrecks, Luc Heymans came to know about the
shipwreck. His company Cosmix Underwater Research Ltd; and his
Indonesian partners, Paradigma Putra Sejathera PT, made a joint offer to
the Indonesian Government about salvaging the shipwreck. Indonesian
Government responded positively and an agreement was signed in due
course. According to this agreement, Luc Heymans's company was allowed
to survey the sea bottom at that point and take out any valuables found
near the shipwreck. From the salvaged valuables, if any items, which
could be considered as Indonesia,s national heritage, are found ,those
would be kept by the Government. The balance materials that are salvaged
could be sold by Luc's company and profits would be shared on equal
basis. Indonesian Government issued necessary permits to Luc's company.
Luc
Heymans collected about 10 Million US$ from his investors in US and
started his search operations at the site of the shipwreck. The wreck
was spread at a depth of 45 meters over a 40 meter square area on the
sea bottom. Luc Heymans says that at the shipwreck site, they found no
remnant broken down wooden planks or pieces of the ship itself, but only
a mountain of broken chinaware. A french deep sea diver, Daniel
Visnikar, employed by Luc, says that on the second day of the hunt, he
found a golden dagger hilt, under a chinaware scrap heap that was 1 foot
high. Between February 2004 to October 2005, Luc Heymans and his team
consisting of 13 deep sea divers (3 Australian, 2 British, 3 French, 3
Belgian, 2 German) found an unbelievable quantity of two hundred and
fifty thousand pieces of rare Chinaware like jars, plates and bowls made
in the tenth century, precious jewels and other valuable items. To
salvage these items, Luc Heyman''s team made in all, about 22000 to
24000 deep sea dives. Since the Chinaware was found to be made in tenth
century CE, it was obvious that the ship was wrecked around that time
only. The archeologists were able to confirm from this find that
substantial trade was being carried out between China, Java, Sumatra,
India and Egypt by this sea route as early as tenth century. Since the
ship manufactured from wood was underwater for more than 1000 years, the
wood had completely rotted and decayed away and not a single speck of
wood was found anywhere at the shipwreck site. What was left was the
chinaware and items made from bronze and gold.
The
precious cargo being carried by the ship and now salvaged from the
bottom of the sea, contained many valuable items like Chinaware from
the times of Liao dynasty rule in China ( 907-1125 CE ) and Five
dynasties period (907-960 CE). There were chinaware plates with polished
edges and having pictures of birds and dragons, plates with greenish
colour, teapots with lotus motif and a large vase. The cargo also
contained, famed Persian glassware and Egyptian quartz-ware. Besides
this, 11000 pearls, 4000 rubies, 400 dark red coloured sapphires and
2200 garnets were also found. Luc and his team numbered each and every
item together with information as to which part of the site these were
found. They also prepared a DVD giving all these details along with
photographs of all items and have handed over this DVD to Indonesian
authorities.
Luc
Heymans says that salvaging the valuables from the sea bottom was the
easiest part of the whole operation. His problems were all caused by
other humans. When it was known that Luc Haymans team has located the
treasures, divers from some other company suddenly appeared at the site.
It took lot of effort to call police and prevent others from salvaging
the treasures. In spite of having all permissions and licenses in hand. 2
divers from Luc's team were arrested by Indonesian Navy and put in
jail. It took quite an effort to get them released.
As
per the agreement with the Indonesian Government Luc Heymans is allowed
to auction and subsequent export of the valuables from the wreck.
However it was found out by the Government later, that there were no
laws in Indonesia, that could deal with exploration and export of such
shipwreck treasures. Because of the red tape and procedural delays the
treasures have been lying in a warehouse.
Finally
in the middle of 2010 an auction of the valuables was finally
announced. Indonesian Government expected a price of 80 Million Dollars
for the valuables. As per terms of the auction, a security deposit of 16
Million Dollars was required from the bidders. Finding these terms
unacceptable, no bidders turned up at the day of auction and the entire
auction plan turned into a fiasco.
Luc
Haymans and his investors have invested lot of money in this operation
and can only hope now that at least during next auction, someone or a
museum from some country of the world, would bid for the valuables.
-2-
Belitung Shipwreck
Belitung
is a small island located in Java sea, famous for its picturesque
beaches. In a map, you can see it just north of Java island and
approximately northeast of the southern tip of Sumatra island. The
shipping traffic that sails through Sunda Straits and going towards
South China Sea, passes along the west coastline of this island. In
1998, fishermen searching for sea cucumbers on this coastline
discovered an ancient shipwreck here. The wreck found at a depth of
about 51 feet was in shallow waters near the coastline and therefor was
very vulnerable to looting and accidental damage because of the fishing
activity. Because of this reason, Indonesian Government soon authorized
the salvaging operation and entrusted this job to a German company.
A Replica of the sunken ship
Even
though this salvaging company, appointed few archeologists to record
the details of the site, the ship and the contents, it is believed that
the job was not done professionally enough and commercial angle was
given more importance than recording the historical significance. The
salvaging company salvaged all the valuables from the ship and found a
staggering number of more than 60,000 individual items mostly consisting
of chinaware, gold and silver objects besides few personal items. From
the position of the shipwreck, it was generally believed that the ship
had began the voyage from some southern port of China and had passed
through Singapore and was travelling towards Sunda straits to proceed to
Indian ocean to reach its destination in the middle east. The
company, which did salvaging, were luckier than Luc Haymans company,
described in Part I,
as Singapore government got interested in the historical significance
of the cargo and bought off the salavged items in one lot for 40 Million
Dollars. The priceless cargo is now exhibited in the Asian
Civilizations Museum in Singapore and is well worth a visit.
A gold cup with figures of musicians
A pair of gold bowls
A pair of square gold dishes
A Gold dish, bracelet and a bowl
A silver flask
The
ship was constructed from wooden planks sewn together as was the
practice of those days in the Persian gulf. It was obvious that the ship
owners were from west Asia. The analysis showed that the wood for the
ship mostly came from Africa with some additions made with native Indian
and south east Asian woods. On one of the bowls found in the
shipwreck, a date corresponding to year 826 CE was found inscribed. In
addition, the chinaware found in the wreck has distinct characteristics
of chinaware produced during Tang dynasty rule in China. From these
two facts, the year of the shipwreck is believed to be around year 830
CE. This shipwreck therefor was considered as the first and the most
important proof of the heavy volume of trade in ceramics that took place
between China and Abbasid empire of west Asia with its capital in
Baghdad. Besides ceramics, number of items crafted in gold and silver
also were salvaged. All these goods prove the amount of cultural and
trade exchanges between east and west more that 1100 years ago.
A collection of ceramic plates with exquisite designs
Ceramic Ewar and a stopper
Storage jars
Ceramic objects from China, Tang period
More ceramic pots
We
may never know, where the ship was actually headed? Whether it chose
the sea route through Sunda straits, to avid rampant piracy in Malacca
straits of those days? Or was it headed for Java to unload some cargo or
pick up new crew? We can only infer that huge international trading
activity went on even during those days and the craze for imported
goodies is something that we have inherited since a long time.
-3-
Mentawai Shipwrecks
Mentawai are a group of
islands on the west side of the island of Sumatra. Over an year ago,
these islands were the first to face the slamming by the giant Tsunami
wave that eventually battered Indonesian island of Sumatra. The giant
Tsunami wave pushed into view, 4 shipwrecks near the coastline of
Mentawai islands. One of the shipwrecks is now in just 20 feet of water.
National Committee of Underwater Heritage, made up of representatives
from 15 ministries and government bodies of Government of Indonesia says
that these four wrecks are part of a huge number of 463 wrecks, that
have been discovered off Indonesia coast. International experts,
referring to documents about missing ships from China and other
countries, believe that actual number of ships lying on the ocean floor
is in the order of ten thousand.
Most of these ships that
went down were laden with precious cargo just like the Cirebon and
Belitung shipwrecks that we have seen in Part I and Part II
of this series of articles. Like these two shipwrecks, the ships, not
yet salvaged, are likely to be loaded with valuables such as 9th
century ceramics,imperial-quality gold boxes , exquisite jewels, funeral
urns and inkwells. If salvaged and sold, they can bring in of millions
of dollars for Indonesia.
The Mentawai shipwreck,
for example, is of a ship that belonged to Dutch East India company and
the tidbits that have been found by enterprising fishermen around the
wreck, include broken pieces of blue-and-white ceramics, a tiny perfume
bottle, a sword handle and broken wine flasks, one of which is still
sealed with a wooden cork.
Fishermen have located
some bronze cannons and anchor of the ship. Government maritime
officials in Mentawai, are trying to protect the shipwrecks from
poachers and fishermen, who want to break into the wrecks, as no clear
Government policy about the issue is forthcoming. As things stand now,
salvage operations are all stopped. Indonesian Government earned very
little in the Belitung shipwreck and as a result further salvaging work
was stopped. Considerable political wrangling is going on now in Jakarta
to sort out the issue.
The major issues here,
that are now being debated, are the serious objections raised by marine
archeologists regarding this whole concept of salvaging shipwrecks for
commercial gains. Archeologists feel that salvagers are recovering only
things that are monetarily valuable, and that might represent just a
small percentage of the entire collection of artifacts on the wreck. The
salvagers may open the shipwrecks by blasting through or by breaking
down historically or archaeologically important artifacts.
The case of the Belitung
shipwreck is being presented by Indonesian Government as a sample case.
Out of 40 Million Dollars paid by Singapore, Indonesian Government got
only 2.8 Million and a number of artifacts, not wanted by Singapore.
They feel that they have received a raw deal. Indonesia also has not yet
adopted the 2001 U.N. convention on protecting underwater cultural
heritage though in 2010 it passed a law protecting underwater cultural
heritage. No rules or guidelines have been yet framed.
Many archeologists feel
that commercial exploitation of the shipwrecks and the publicity given
is creating an unnecessary demand worldwide for shipwreck artifacts.
Because of this criticism, Smithsonian Institution from Washington D.C.
cancelled their proposed exhibition of Belitung shipwreck artifacts.
Many believe that museums should not display these items at all.
As the controversy rages,
salvaging companies justify their operations by saying that otherwise
the artifacts would be just looted and all information would be gone
forever. If the commercial angle is lost, not many would be willing to
salvage the artifacts. Meanwhile Millions of Dollars worth artifacts are
just lying on the sea bed in need of protection.
-------
UNESCO AND THE BELITUNG SHIPWRECK: THE NEED
ReplyDeleteFOR A PERMISSIVE DEFINITION OF
“COMMERCIAL EXPLOITATION”
This Note first examines the 2001 Convention's practical effects on both the recovery of underwater cultural heritage in general and the artifacts recovered from the Belitung Shipwreck in particular. Next, it demonstrates that Indonesia did everything it reasonably could to preserve the Belitung Shipwreck, and that its actions largely adhered to the Convention's spirit and requirements. Finally, it argues that the Convention could better achieve its goals if it contained a definition of "commercial exploitation" that permitted States to responsibly utilize private salvage companies, rather than abiding by the restrictive rule favored by academic archaeologists.
Read the article: http://docs.law.gwu.edu/stdg/gwilr/PDFs/45-4/6-%20Coleman%20Note.pdf